Skip to main content
NextGen MedPrep logoNextGenMedPrep

Holistic Review in US Medical School Admissions

The AAMC framework, all 15 Core Competencies, post-SCOTUS 2023 admissions changes, and how to demonstrate your strengths in the primary, secondaries, and at interview.

AAMC Core Competencies Post-SCOTUS framing

What is holistic review?

Holistic review is the AAMC-endorsed framework under which US medical schools assess applicants across academics, experiences, and personal attributes — rather than ranking solely on GPA and MCAT. The AAMC formally introduced and promoted the holistic review approach starting around 2014 through its Holistic Review Project.

The framework rests on three dimensions, sometimes called the "three pillars" of holistic review:

Experiences

Clinical, research, service, leadership — what you have done and how it shaped you.

Attributes

Personal qualities, values, resilience, communication — who you are as a person and future physician.

Academics

GPA, science GPA, MCAT, coursework rigor — your demonstrated capacity to handle medical school curriculum.

Schools applying holistic review weight these three dimensions differently based on their mission, student body composition goals, and accreditation requirements (LCME requires schools to assess diversity in their student selection processes). The AAMC describes the process in its "Anatomy of an Applicant" framework, which outlines what a competitive, holistically-assessed applicant looks like across these three pillars.

AAMC Core Competencies for Entering Medical Students

The AAMC has published 15 Core Competencies organized into four buckets. Admissions committees use these to assess the full range of an applicant's preparation. Each competency should be evidenced — explicitly or implicitly — somewhere in your application.

Thinking and Reasoning
Critical Thinking. Applies analytical reasoning to interpret evidence, identify assumptions, and draw sound conclusions.
Quantitative Reasoning. Uses numerical data and mathematical relationships to solve problems and interpret scientific information.
Scientific Inquiry. Applies the scientific method, interprets research findings, and understands how science informs medical practice.
Written Communication. Conveys ideas clearly in writing — evidenced in personal statement, secondaries, and any written academic work.
Science
Living Systems. Demonstrates knowledge of biological processes, physiology, and the molecular basis of health and disease.
Human Behavior. Understands psychological, social, and behavioral factors shaping health outcomes and patient decisions.
Interpersonal
Service Orientation. Demonstrates a genuine desire to serve others, especially those in need; evidenced by sustained volunteer work and clinical engagement.
Social Skills. Communicates effectively, navigates conflict, and builds trust in diverse interpersonal contexts.
Cultural Competence. Works respectfully and effectively with patients and colleagues from diverse cultural and social backgrounds.
Teamwork. Collaborates productively, shares credit, and subordinates personal priorities to team goals when appropriate.
Oral Communication. Speaks clearly and persuasively; adapts communication style for different audiences — patients, colleagues, community members.
Intrapersonal
Ethical Responsibility to Self and Others. Acts with integrity; applies ethical principles to complex situations; demonstrates professional behavior consistently.
Reliability and Dependability. Fulfills commitments reliably over time; sustained engagement in activities reflects this rather than short-term bursts.
Resilience and Adaptability. Manages setbacks constructively; adapts to new or challenging environments; demonstrates growth under pressure.
Capacity for Improvement. Reflects honestly on performance; actively seeks and incorporates feedback; pursues self-development.
Source: AAMC Core Competencies for Entering Medical Students, accessible at aamc.org. Schools may weight these competencies differently based on mission; some — like Service Orientation — are weighted heavily at mission-driven programs (JHU, BUSM, Stanford, state flagship schools with community health focus).

Post-SCOTUS 2023 framing

In June 2023 (Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and UNC), the US Supreme Court ruled that race-conscious admissions programs at both Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The ruling applies to all selective institutions in the US, including medical schools.

What schools may no longer do:
  • Use race as a factor in any individual admissions decision
  • Apply a racial preference to achieve demographic representation goals
  • Treat racial identity as a plus factor in a holistic review scoring rubric
What schools and applicants may still do:
  • Applicants may discuss how their racial identity shaped their lived experiences in their essays
  • Schools may consider how socioeconomic disadvantage, first-generation status, geographic origin, and similar factors shaped an applicant's preparation and opportunities
  • Schools may continue to run pipeline programs (e.g. SMDEP, SNMA, Tour for Diversity in Medicine) that do not involve race-based admissions decisions
  • Schools may continue to value and assess "diversity of background and perspective" via their holistic review of experiences and attributes

The AAMC issued post-SCOTUS guidance in 2023 affirming its commitment to holistic review and to building a diverse medical workforce. The AAMC's position is that diversity in medicine improves health outcomes, reduces disparities, and better serves all patients — and that holistic review, properly applied, can continue to support these goals within the new legal framework. Schools have adapted by expanding "lived experiences" and "community of origin" essay prompts, and by building interview processes that assess depth of engagement with underserved communities rather than identity alone.

Mission fit

Medical schools vary significantly in their stated missions — and in what they actually value in applicants. Mission fit is the alignment between your background, goals, and values and the school's mission. Strong mission fit improves secondary response rates, interview offers, and acceptance rates.

Research-intensive programs
Examples: Johns Hopkins, UCSF, HMS, CUSOM

Research productivity, publications, poster presentations, intellectual curiosity in science, evidence of scholarly inquiry beyond coursework.

Primary care / community-focused
Examples: University of Washington, New Mexico, many regional state schools

Clinical experience in underserved settings, interest in primary care or general practice, connection to rural or low-income communities, public health awareness.

Faith-based institutions
Examples: Loma Linda, Georgetown, Creighton, Loyola, St. George's

Service ethics, community service history, alignment with institution's ethical framework, reflective responses to mission-based secondary prompts.

DO programs
Examples: PCOM, TOURO, Midwestern University colleges, NYITCOM

Service orientation, holistic approach to health, patient-centered care values, interest in primary care, openness to OMM philosophy.

Before writing each secondary, read the school's mission statement, browse its curriculum highlights, and identify 2-3 specific features that genuinely resonate with your background. Mirror that language authentically in your response — do not simply copy it.

Service orientation — a uniquely-US AAMC value

Service orientation is one of the AAMC's 15 Core Competencies and one of its most heavily weighted — particularly at mission-driven MD programs and most DO programs. It differs from clinical hours: service orientation is about a genuine desire to help others, especially vulnerable or underserved populations, evidenced by sustained engagement over time.

Characteristics of high-scoring service orientation evidence:

  • Sustained over time — a year of weekly volunteering outweighs three one-time events
  • With underserved populations — free clinic patients, unhoused individuals, immigrant and refugee communities, rural patients, individuals with disabilities
  • Reflective — you can articulate what the experience taught you about systemic health barriers, not just what tasks you completed
  • Driven by others' needs, not CV-building — applications that read as mission-aligned score better than those that read as checkbox completion
Service orientation is distinct from interpersonal skills. You can be highly socially skilled but not service-oriented. Conversely, genuine service orientation often appears in quiet, non-glamorous roles — a hospice volunteer, a reading tutor in a Title I school, a weekend shelter worker — rather than in leadership titles.

Intellectual curiosity and scholarly approach

US medical schools — especially research-intensive programs — value intellectual curiosity and a scholarly approach to knowledge. This is evidenced through research experience, independent study, and the ability to engage critically with scientific literature.

In practice, this means:

  • Research experience: laboratory, clinical, public health, or health services research — publications, posters, and abstracts strengthen this claim significantly
  • Scientific reasoning in your personal statement: discussing a patient experience or clinical observation in terms of the underlying biology or clinical question demonstrates intellectual engagement
  • Coursework beyond requirements: upper-level electives, independent studies, senior theses show intellectual range
  • Active questioning at clinical sites: demonstrating curiosity rather than passive observation during shadowing and clinical work

For research-intensive programs (top-30 MD schools), research experience is increasingly a de facto requirement. An applicant with 500+ research hours, poster presentations, and at least a submitted manuscript is meaningfully stronger than one without research for these programs. For primary-care-focused schools and DO programs, research is valued but service and clinical experience often carry more weight.

Cultural humility and interpersonal strength

The AAMC's competency framework uses "Cultural Competence" as a label, but the medical education community has increasingly shifted toward "cultural humility" as the operative concept — and this distinction shows up in secondary prompts and interview questions.

Cultural competence framing (outdated)

"I am culturally competent with X community because I volunteered there." — implies a finite, achievable skill set; can come across as presumptuous.

Cultural humility framing (preferred)

"Working with X community taught me to question my own assumptions about Y and helped me understand that Z is shaped by historical factors I had not considered." — reflects ongoing learning and self-awareness.

Strong cultural humility evidence includes: sustained work with populations from backgrounds different from your own, specific moments where your assumptions were challenged and what you did with that, language skills used in clinical settings, community health work at ACCHOs, FQHCs, or mobile health units serving diverse populations.

Resilience, reliability and the intrapersonal bucket

The AAMC's intrapersonal competencies — resilience, reliability, ethical responsibility, and capacity for improvement — are assessed primarily through the personal statement, the Activities section, and at interview. These are the hardest to fake and the easiest to demonstrate through consistent, sustained behavior over time.

Resilience and adaptability

Evidenced by recovering from a GPA dip, a failed MCAT attempt, a gap year born of hardship, a major life disruption that you navigated constructively. The narrative arc matters: growth after setback is a strong personal statement theme when written specifically and honestly.

Reliability and dependability

Evidenced by sustained commitments — 2 years of weekly volunteering, a 3-year research involvement, a leadership role held across multiple semesters. A long list of activities each lasting one semester reads as resume-building; 3-4 activities spanning 2-3 years reads as reliable commitment.

Ethical responsibility

Assessed at interview through ethical scenario questions. Prepare using the four-principles framework (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) and know AAMC's published considerations on confidentiality, informed consent, and end-of-life care. Do not just give the "right" answer — demonstrate that you reason through competing values rather than jumping to a conclusion.

How to demonstrate holistic strengths across your application

Each component of the application addresses different competencies. Map your evidence deliberately:

AMCAS Personal Statement (5,300 characters)

Primary narrative of why medicine. Should demonstrate: service orientation, intellectual curiosity, and 1-2 intrapersonal competencies through a specific story arc. Avoid listing activities — that is what the Activities section is for.

Activities Section (15 entries, 700 characters each; 3 Most Meaningful, 1,325 characters each)

Evidences the full range of experiences (clinical, research, service, leadership). The three Most Meaningful Experiences should demonstrate your deepest reflective thinking and strongest competency claims.

Secondary Essays (school-specific, ~250-500 words each)

Mission fit, "Why our school", lived experience, adversity, diversity. Each essay should be school-specific and evidence the competencies most valued by that school's mission. Do not recycle without adaptation.

Letters of Recommendation (3-4 minimum)

Clinical or research supervisor letters should evidence service orientation, intellectual curiosity, and interpersonal competencies from a third-party perspective. Science professor letters evidence academic preparation. Pre-med committee letter (if available) synthesizes the full picture.

MMI and Traditional Interviews

Evidences ethical reasoning, communication, cultural humility, resilience, and mission fit in real time. Prepare specific examples for each AAMC competency bucket — interviewers are often trained to probe for evidence of specific competencies.

Frequently asked questions

In June 2023, the US Supreme Court ruled that race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and UNC violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This effectively ended the use of race as a direct factor in admissions decisions at US medical schools. However, the Court's opinion explicitly allowed applicants to discuss how their racial identity shaped their lived experiences, and it allowed schools to consider the effects of race-based discrimination on an applicant's life as part of a holistic review. The AAMC issued post-SCOTUS guidance affirming that schools could continue to use holistic review, assess the full range of applicants' backgrounds and experiences, and value diversity — but could no longer use race as a factor in any individual admissions decision. Schools have responded by expanding 'lived experience' essay prompts and by emphasizing socioeconomic background, first-generation status, language spoken at home, geographic origin, and other dimensions of diversity that remain permissible to consider.

The AAMC formally adopted a holistic review framework in 2014 and encourages all member schools to implement it. In practice, implementation varies: highly competitive research-intensive programs (the T20 MD programs) apply robust multi-factor holistic review across a large applicant pool. Some state-funded schools, operating under tighter budget and legal constraints post-SCOTUS, rely more heavily on quantitative screens (GPA, MCAT) in early review rounds before applying holistic criteria at the interview stage. DO programs via AACOMAS also use holistic review, with an emphasis on service orientation and primary care mission alignment consistent with osteopathic philosophy.

Yes. The Supreme Court's 2023 ruling specifically preserved the ability of applicants to discuss in their essays how race affected their lives — through discrimination experienced, cultural identity, community connection, and related themes. The prohibition is on schools using race as a factor in the admissions decision itself. What you write about in your personal statement is your narrative; what the admissions committee may not do is weigh it differently based on racial identity alone. In practice, many applicants describe experiences of racial discrimination, cultural heritage, or community health work in their essays — this is permissible and, where it reflects genuine experience and insight, often compelling.

Service orientation is about demonstrated commitment to others over time, not a specific activity type. Paid work caring for others (CNA, disability support worker, patient care technician, community health worker) often demonstrates service orientation more convincingly than one-time volunteering. Family caregiving — being a primary carer for a sibling, parent, or grandparent — is increasingly recognized as evidence of service orientation. The key is sustained engagement and genuine reflection: in your activities section and secondary essays, describe what the experience of serving others taught you, not just what you did. Service to underserved communities, health equity work, and advocacy roles are all legitimate and valued.

The AAMC's framework uses the term 'Cultural Competence' as a Core Competency name, but leading medical educators have widely shifted to 'cultural humility' as the operative concept — and many secondaries and interviews now explicitly use this term. The distinction matters: cultural competence implies a finite set of skills you can acquire; cultural humility implies an ongoing, reflective practice of examining your own assumptions and remaining open to learning from others. In your application, frame cultural interactions as learning experiences, not demonstrations of expertise. 'I have learned X from working with Y community' reads as more culturally humble than 'I am culturally competent with Y community.'

Mission fit is how well your background, goals, and values align with a school's stated mission. A research-intensive school (UCSF, Johns Hopkins, HMS) will look for evidence of scholarly inquiry, research productivity, and scientific curiosity. A primary-care-focused school (many regional state programs, some DO schools) will look for commitment to underserved communities, primary care interest, and rural or community health experience. A faith-based school (Loma Linda, Georgetown, Creighton, Loyola) may assess alignment with its ethical or service mission. Read each school's mission statement before writing its secondary. Mirror its language (authentically) and connect your experience to its specific values.

Strengthen your holistic application with a NextGenMedPrep adviser

One-to-one sessions to map your experiences to AAMC Core Competencies, review your personal statement and secondaries, and prepare for holistic interview formats.

Book a session Application strategy guide

Related US medicine guides

Reviewed by Isaac Butler-King, medical student at the University of Glasgow. Last reviewed: June 5, 2026
Holistic Review in US Medical School Admissions — AAMC Core Competencies & Post-SCOTUS Framework | NGMP