Skip to main content

Prescribing opioids amid the overdose crisis

MMIHard
Ethics · 8 minSelf-marked
How to use this: start the timer and answer the question out loud (or type it). Then grade yourself 0–3 on each skill with a note of your evidence — exactly as our examiners do. Hit Reveal benchmark & score to see what a model answer scores and how you compare. Everything saves to your browser automatically.
Answer timer
8:00/ 8 min suggested
1

Answer the question

Prescribing opioids amid the overdose crisis

A long-term patient on chronic opioids for genuine pain asks for an early refill, saying he ran out. The state prescription drug monitoring program shows he recently filled a similar prescription from another provider. Against the backdrop of the US overdose epidemic, how do you handle this consultation?

Likely follow-ups
1

How do you balance the duty to treat pain against the risk of contributing to misuse or diversion?

2

What is your understanding of how the opioid crisis evolved, and how should that history shape prescribing today?

3

If you suspected opioid use disorder, what would you offer rather than simply cutting him off?

Your answer

Speak it out loud and we'll type it for you (free), or type your own notes — then mark yourself below.

Resources & frameworks
  • Four pillars: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice.
  • Name the conflict → weigh both sides → gather more info → safe, patient-centered action.
What strong answers do
Reveal the benchmark

Hidden so they don't bias your answer. Score yourself first, then reveal them to compare.

  • Resist the two easy extremes: reflexively refilling, or abruptly abandoning the patient. Abrupt discontinuation or 'firing' patients on chronic opioids is itself dangerous and is now explicitly cautioned against, because it can drive people to illicit fentanyl and precipitate withdrawal or overdose. So your stance should be calm, non-accusatory inquiry. Tell the patient honestly what the PDMP shows, ask open questions about how he is using the medication and whether his pain or life circumstances have changed, and treat the discrepancy as information to understand rather than a crime to prosecute. Interviewers want to see clinical curiosity and a therapeutic alliance preserved under pressure.
  • Show you understand the crisis as a system, not a morality tale. A credible answer sketches the arc: aggressive prescribing in the 1990s and 2000s amid pain-as-fifth-vital-sign campaigns and misleading marketing, followed by a tightening of supply, then waves of heroin and now illicitly manufactured fentanyl driving the majority of overdose deaths. The lesson is that simply cutting prescriptions without offering treatment can push patients toward a far more lethal illicit supply. The CDC's revised 2022 guideline deliberately moved away from rigid dose ceilings toward individualized, patient-centered care, and citing that signals genuine currency.
  • Pivot to what you would offer if use disorder is in play. Strong candidates name screening, a respectful conversation, naloxone co-prescribing, and access to medications for opioid use disorder, buprenorphine or methadone, which are evidence-based and lifesaving, plus the fact that the federal X-waiver requirement to prescribe buprenorphine was eliminated, broadening access. The throughline is harm reduction and continuity: you do not solve this by severing the relationship. Demonstrating that you can hold compassion and appropriate caution simultaneously, while keeping the patient engaged and safe, is exactly the maturity these stations test.
2

Mark yourself

Score each skill against the rubric, then add a line of evidence. Scale:

0Not shown1Limited2Good3Excellent
Quick mark:Completion: 0%

Ethical reasoning

0/3

Balances the duty to treat pain against diversion risk without abandoning the patient

Empathy

0/3

Approaches a difficult disclosure with curiosity rather than accusation

Knowledge of the healthcare system

0/3

Understands the crisis's history, PDMPs, the 2022 CDC guideline, and MOUD access

Decision-making under uncertainty

0/3

Acts safely without complete information

3

Reflect & score

What would you change next time?
Your overall score / 10
Total: 0/12
Saved to your browser