Te Tiriti — Protection and Participation in a Consent Scenario

Hidden so they don't bias your answer. Score yourself first, then reveal them to compare.

• Protection means Te Tiriti partners are obligated to actively protect Māori health and wellbeing, not simply avoid harm. Here protection requires you to pause: a patient whose whānau wanted to be present and who felt pressure to 'not hold things up' is describing a context that compromises voluntariness. Voluntariness is a legal and ethical requirement of valid consent — not a box-ticking exercise. You must explore whether he wants to wait, call whānau, or proceed.
• Participation means Māori must be able to engage in health decisions in a way that is meaningful and culturally responsive. If Rangi's usual decision-making process involves family deliberation, a rushed individual signature bypasses participation. Practical steps: ask him what he needs ('Is there someone you'd like to call? I have a few minutes'). Contact his whānau if he wants. Offer a hospital phone. Document the conversation. This takes five minutes and protects everyone.
• With the surgical team: be calm and factual. 'I've spoken with the patient — he mentioned his whānau wanted to be present and I want to make sure consent is fully informed. Can we give him ten minutes to make a call?' A brief delay is vastly preferable to a post-operative complaint about consent. Strong candidates frame this as patient safety and legal risk, not as a cultural objection — that framing gets buy-in from time-pressured colleagues.