A-Level and academic profile
Nottingham requires AAA including Chemistry and Biology. Warwick (GEM) requires A*AA (for undergraduate) - Graduate entry also available. Warwick (GEM) is the stricter A-Level offer; Nottingham is slightly more forgiving. If your predicted grades are borderline, Nottingham carries the lower academic-rejection risk pre-interview. GCSE profile matters at both schools — Nottingham: GCSE results form part of the academic profile alongside A-Level predictions. Maths and English at minimum grade 6 typically expected. Warwick (GEM): Not applicable - Warwick is a graduate-entry-only programme. Requires a 2:1 honours degree (any subject).
Interview formats
Both Nottingham and Warwick (GEM) use MMI interviews, so the underlying prep approach is the same — practise ethics frameworks, NHS hot-topic answers and (for MMI) structured station responses against a timer. Interview windows: Nottingham interviews in December - March; Warwick (GEM) in December.
Curriculum and teaching style
Nottingham runs a Integrated curriculum; Warwick (GEM) runs a PBL curriculum. The teaching philosophies are different — Nottingham delivers more didactic lectures with structured systems-based progression, while Warwick (GEM) centres learning around clinical cases. Specifics: Five-year MBChB with compulsory intercalated BMedSci built into the course (one of few UK schools to embed BMedSci as standard). Four-year accelerated MBChB for graduate entrants. Problem-based learning with significant clinical exposure from Year 1. Intake size: Nottingham — ~250 home + ~30 international places per year.; Warwick (GEM) — ~190 home + ~15 international places per year (4-year accelerated MBChB).. A larger cohort means more peer breadth; a smaller cohort means more tutor contact.
What makes each distinctive
Nottingham: Scoring system is now distinct from Lincoln's, weighting GCSE (/32), UCAT (/40) and SJT (/10) - band 4 SJT auto-rejected. No use of predicted A-level grades. Warwick (GEM): Graduate entry programme with selection-centre structure rather than traditional MMI. Strong emphasis on team working and observed group behaviour. Interviewers score across the full range of activities.