Holistic Review in Dental Admissions: Evaluating Non-Traditional Applicants
ADEA and dental school admissions committees have increasingly adopted holistic review processes that consider an applicant's lived experiences, community contributions, and demonstrated commitment to underserved populations alongside academic metrics and DAT scores. A dental school admissions committee is reviewing two applicants: Applicant A has a 3.8 GPA and a 23 DAT score and has spent two summers conducting basic science research in a dental school lab. Applicant B has a 3.4 GPA and a 20 DAT score, grew up in a Dental Health Professional Shortage Area, worked as a dental assistant for three years while supporting family members, and has demonstrated sustained commitment to oral health advocacy in her community. How should a holistic review committee think about these two applicants, and what does research on workforce diversity suggest about the downstream impact of admissions choices?
Likely follow-up · A colleague on the admissions committee argues that academic metrics are objective and other factors are inherently subjective, and therefore the committee should weight GPA and DAT score most heavily. How do you engage with this position?
