Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine (DMD) Dental School2027 Entry Requirements & Interview Format

Dexterity Under Mirror Vision: Adapting to Indirect Operative Dentistry

One of the most challenging motor adaptations in dental school is learning to work under mirror vision — using a dental mirror to visualize structures that you cannot see directly, and performing cutting and retraction movements in a mentally reversed spatial field.

Many students find that their natural hand coordination fails them initially under mirror vision, and that building reliable indirect-vision dexterity requires sustained deliberate practice.

Describe how you would approach the challenge of learning to work under mirror vision, how you would seek feedback from faculty during the learning process, and how the concept of deliberate practice applies to this specific challenge.

Likely follow-up · During your first simulation lab session requiring mirror vision, you complete a preparation that your faculty evaluator grades as inadequate in two out of three dimensions. Walk me through your emotional and practical response to receiving this feedback.

Fluoride Policy: Defending Evidence-Based Public Health to a Skeptical Patient

Community water fluoridation at optimal levels (0.7 mg/L as recommended by CDC) has been a cornerstone of US public health dental policy since the 1940s and is credited by the CDC as one of the ten great public health achievements of the twentieth century.

In recent years, anti-fluoride advocacy has grown on social media, CDC and ADA affirm the safety and effectiveness of community water fluoridation at the US recommended level of 0.7 mg/L, and WHO supports fluoridation as an effective caries-prevention measure at levels adapted to local climate and total intake.

Do not cite the National Academies as endorsing fluoridation — it has issued no such affirmation. Its role was peer-reviewing NTP's draft fluoride monograph, where in 2021 it told NTP the draft "cannot be used to draw conclusions about low fluoride exposure concentrations, including those typically associated with drinking-water fluoridation."

The final 2024 NTP monograph links reduced IQ to exposures at or above 1.5 mg/L — more than double the US level — and states that it "does not address whether the exposure to fluoride added to drinking water is associated with a measurable effect on IQ."

That threshold, not an appeal to the National Academies, is the rebuttal to know. A patient in your chair tells you they have stopped giving their children fluoridated water because of concerns about IQ effects they read about online. How do you respond?

Likely follow-up · The patient cites a 2012 Harvard meta-analysis that they say showed fluoride reduces IQ. How do you respond to a patient who has a specific scientific citation for their concern?