Skip to main content
Back to Medical School Compare
Medical school comparison

Imperial College London vs Nottingham

Imperial College London and Nottingham are both UK medical schools, but the path to an offer at each is meaningfully different. Imperial College London is based in London (London) while Nottingham sits in Nottingham (England), and the regional context shapes everything from fee status to NHS-deanery destination.

On UCAT alone there is roughly a 470-point gap between them — a substantial difference that should shape which you list as firm choice vs. insurance.

Side-by-side comparison

Imperial College London

London

Quick comparison

Location
London, UK
A-Level offer
A*AA at A-level with the A* in Chemistry or Biology
TrueScore
2340
UCAT home cut-off
2320+ /2700 (2026 entry official cut-off)
Interview format
Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI)
Post-interview chance
All Applicants: 662/852 = 78% (2025). 280 international interviews, ~2130 international applicants.
Decision date
March onwards

Nottingham

Nottingham

Quick comparison

Location
Nottingham, UK
A-Level offer
AAA at A-level including Biology and Chemistry. No use of predicted grades - Nottingham considers achieved grades only.
TrueScore
1850
UCAT home cut-off
~1850+ /2700 with B1 SJT and 8× grade 9s GCSE (2024 entry lowest invited ≈ 1830)
Interview format
Multiple Mini Interviews (MMI)
Post-interview chance
All Students (2024): 519/913 = 57% (or 336/911 = 37% from another source); A108 WP Foundation Year: 61/188 = 32%
Decision date
March onwards

Imperial College London vs Nottingham - in detail

UCAT thresholds compared

Imperial College London's published UCAT threshold for home applicants is around 2320, while Nottingham sits at approximately 1850.

That's a 470-point gap — large enough to put the two schools in completely different competitiveness tiers. An applicant scoring in the 2000-2200 band would be competitive at Nottingham but borderline at Imperial College London.

Contextual / widening-participation cut-offs differ — Imperial College London: 2170+ /2700 (2026 entry official contextual cut-off); Nottingham: ~1700+ /2700 (A108 Foundation Year - lower threshold). Eligible applicants should weight this heavily when choosing.

A-Level and academic profile

Imperial College London requires AAA including Chemistry and Biology.

Nottingham requires AAA including Chemistry and Biology.

Both demand the same A-Level grade band, so academic prediction is unlikely to differentiate your application between them — provided you meet the required subject combination at each.

GCSE profile matters at both schools — Imperial College London: Strong GCSE profile expected; not algorithmically scored but considered alongside UCAT and academic record. Nottingham: GCSE results form part of the academic profile alongside A-Level predictions. Maths and English at minimum grade 6 typically expected.

Interview formats

Both Imperial College London and Nottingham use MMI interviews, so the underlying prep approach is the same — practise ethics frameworks, NHS hot-topic answers and (for MMI) structured station responses against a timer.

Interview windows: Imperial College London interviews in December - February; Nottingham in December - March.

Curriculum and teaching style

Both schools deliver a Integrated-style curriculum, so day-to-day study habits will feel similar across years 1-3.

Specifics: Six-year MBBS BSc with integrated science teaching from Year 1. Compulsory intercalated BSc in Year 4. Clinical placements from Year 3 across Imperial Five-year MBChB with compulsory intercalated BMedSci built into the course (one of few UK schools to embed BMedSci as standard).

Intake size: Imperial College London — ~271 home + ~74 overseas fee status places per year (one of the largest international intakes in the UK).; Nottingham — ~250 home + ~30 international places per year.. A larger cohort means more peer breadth; a smaller cohort means more tutor contact.

Post-interview offer rate

Imperial College London: All Applicants: 662/852 = 78% (2025). 280 international interviews, ~2130 international applicants. Nottingham: All Students (2024): 519/913 = 57% (or 336/911 = 37% from another source); A108 WP Foundation Year: 61/188 = 32%.

Post-interview odds give you the clearest signal of how competitive each school is at the final stage — a school with a 60% post-interview success rate is structurally easier to convert than one at 25%, even if the interview thresholds look identical on paper.

What makes each distinctive

Imperial College London: Heavy emphasis on scientific reasoning and the integrated London course structure. Around a quarter of places are now reserved for international applicants. UCAT is the primary shortlisting factor, with personal-statement use limited to exceptional cases.

Nottingham: Scoring system is now distinct from Lincoln's, weighting GCSE (/32), UCAT (/40) and SJT (/10) - band 4 SJT auto-rejected. No use of predicted A-level grades.

Which is right for you?

If your UCAT lands below the UK median (~1880/2700), Nottingham is the more realistic firm-choice option. Regionally, the choice often comes down to cost of living and NHS-deanery preferences — Imperial College London feeds into the London foundation programme network; Nottingham into the England network.

Your firm/insurance choice should ultimately weight: where your UCAT and predicted grades sit relative to each school's threshold, which interview format you can prepare for most credibly, and where you'd actually want to live for five or six years.

Common questions